Post-Match Autopsy · generated from the thread

What was said in this discussion

Published 2026-09-22T08:30:05+00:00. Amended since.

Cast

The cast is the members whose positions were compared; this artefact predates the cast list.

This artefact was published before narratives existed; its quotes and figure stand below.

What was said

Each quote was copied from its source post at the revision named, and can be traced back to it. Quotes live here and only here: the narrative above never reproduces them.

pjp_01M33EW76MQNCDMG1ZQVM68WVA@rev2

withdrawn

The quoted text previously shown here has been removed at the author’s request. It is not reproduced anywhere on this page.

pjp_01M33EW6W445X7NA9J3JZGE7X6@rev1

withdrawn

The quoted text previously shown here has been removed at the author’s request. It is not reproduced anywhere on this page.

Amendments (3)

A published artefact is a thing people have read. It is amended in the open and never silently rewritten.

source_erased 2026-09-22T08:42:23+00:00

A quoted passage was removed at the author's request.

source_erased 2026-09-22T08:42:23+00:00

A quoted passage was removed at the author's request.

figure_recomputed 2026-09-23T18:31:41+00:00

Comparability corrected after the operator's ruling of 2026-09-23 (logic defect): the one counted pair set '500mcg once daily was simply too short a trial to judge' (disagrees) against '250mcg' (agrees). Those are two different propositions under the topic 'dose', not one position asserted and rejected, so the pair is no longer comparable and the denominator is 0. Recomputed from the propositions this artefact itself carries; the frequency and route propositions were erased with their source posts and remain not counted, as published.

as published: pju_01M33DGXAG8C64XFC0RY7736PN and pju_01M33DH1KK96XT01PZNPXXJY16 agree on 0 of 1 comparable topics (0%), with 2 topic(s) not counted

recomputed now: pju_01M33DGXAG8C64XFC0RY7736PN and pju_01M33DH1KK96XT01PZNPXXJY16 have not addressed the same topic yet, so there is nothing to compute.

Common ground

pju_01M33DGXAG8C64XFC0RY7736PN and pju_01M33DH1KK96XT01PZNPXXJY16 agree on 0 of 1 comparable topics (0%), with 2 topic(s) not counted

Underlying agreement0%

0 of 1 comparable topics agreed. The working is below, in full: a figure that cannot be expanded to the posts underneath it is not shown on this site.

dose

disagreed

pju_01M33DGXAG8C64XFC0RY7736PN 500mcg once daily was simply too short a trial to judge pjp_01M33EW76MQNCDMG1ZQVM68WVA@rev2 · read by Pep Junkie

pju_01M33DH1KK96XT01PZNPXXJY16 250mcg pjp_01M33EW6W445X7NA9J3JZGE7X6@rev1 · read by Pep Junkie

one asserts and the other rejects the same position

Not counted (2)

These topics were raised and could not be counted. They are listed rather than dropped, because a denominator that quietly loses a topic is how an agreement figure flatters.

frequency pju_01M33DGXAG8C64XFC0RY7736PN has not taken a position on it

route pju_01M33DGXAG8C64XFC0RY7736PN has not taken a position on it